![]() name=4KiB-Q1-Write -bs=4k -iodepth=1 -numjobs=1 -rw=randwrite name=4KiB-Q32-Write -bs=4k -iodepth=32 -numjobs=1 -rw=randwrite \ name=4KiB-Q32-Read -bs=4k -iodepth=32 -numjobs=1 -rw=randread \ name=4KiB-Q8-Write -bs=4k -iodepth=8 -numjobs=8 -rw=randwrite \ name=4KiB-Q8-Read -bs=4k -iodepth=8 -numjobs=8 -rw=randread \ name=Seq-Q32-Write -bs=1m -iodepth=32 -numjobs=1 -rw=write \ ➜ fio -loops=5 -size=1000m -filename=/home/tomas/disktest.tmp -stonewall -ioengine=libaio -direct=1 -group_reporting \ Here is my attempt at recreating the same benchmark on the Linux host: ![]() Here is the CrystalDiskMark result from a Windows VM on my PC: I've taken a stab at this myself, but I'm nowhere near qualified to say if this is an accurate comparison. So the question is, how would I go about getting the closest possible equivalent of the CrystalDiskMark results on Linux? So I want to run the same benchmark on Linux, but CrystalDiskMark is Windows only. On Windows I'm using CrystalDiskMark, because hey, it's OSS and everyone else uses it. Benchmark: PassMark PerformanceTest 8.I want to be able to test the read/write performance of my disks on Windows and in Linux, and get as accurate a comparison as possible. I will let you take a look at the results in our comparison graphs above.ġ. Generally speaking, the Seagate IronWolf ST10000VN0004 10TB was near the top, if not at the top, in most of the tests. Its 4K and 4K QD32 write performance was obviously no match against the workload optimized Enterprise Capacity 3.5 HDD V.5 either other than 4K QD32 read, but the IronWolf posted class leading results in these areas compared to other mechanical disks, often by a significant margin. Like all HDDs in the presence of an SSD, it was blown away in the 4K and 4K QD32 results. For a drive of this caliber, these results were excellent, as it really shone against the near-enterprise grade Western Digital drives. It was obviously no contest against the Crucial SSD, but neither is the SSD's capacity against this 10TB monster. As you can see in our charts above, compared against a few select drives namely, hard drives from HGST, Seagate, and Western Digital, along with a mainstream MX200 500GB SSD from Crucial, the 7,200RPM Seagate IronWolf 10TB performed exceptionally well. Crystal Disk Mark is an important benchmark, because it tests the input/output operations per second capability of the storage device. Select test data (Random, 0Fill, 1Fill)Ĭrystal Disk Mark 3.0 is in the spotlight. Measure random 512KB, 4KB, 4KB (Queue Depth=32) reads/writes speed
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |